Understanding how installment-based purchasing works, what documents are required, and what to expect during the process is essential before making a commitment. This guide outlines the fundamentals of installment payments and explains how Temer Properties has simplified the process with transparent, buyer-friendly options.
An installment plan allows buyers to pay for their apartment gradually, instead of settling the full price upfront. Typically, this involves:
Temer Properties adapts these plans based on project timelines and client financial preferences, ensuring flexibility for a wide range of buyers.
Temer Properties has structured its installment options with the needs of both local and diaspora buyers in mind. The company distinguishes itself in several ways:
Once a buyer selects a unit in one of Temer Properties’ developments such as the new projects in Garment, Sarbet, Ayat or Piyassa the process is straightforward:
Throughout the construction process , Temer Properties provides continuous updates on their official YouTube Channel and their official website(https://temerproperties.com/construction-update) so buyers are fully informed about the progress of their investment.
Many customers highlight the advantages of installment-based purchasing with Temer Properties:
Temer Properties has built a reputation for combining flexibility, quality, and trust in the Ethiopian real estate market. By offering installment plans with low down payments, zero interest, and customizable schedules, the company opens the door to homeownership for more buyers both within Ethiopia and abroad.
Beyond financial accessibility, Temer’s projects are strategically located in high-demand neighborhoods, backed by a proven record of on-time delivery and transparent communication. For anyone considering buying an apartment in Addis Ababa through installments, Temer Properties represents one of the most reliable and client-focused options available today.
Connect with Temer Properties on their Digital platforms:
Temer Properties
Create | Construct | Deliver
#temerproperties #temerrealestate
]]>A French report has confirmed that the ongoing negotiations between Saudi Arabia and Sudan regarding the demarcation of their maritime borders will not come at the expense of Egypt or its interests related to the Hala’ib, Shalateen, and Abu Ramad triangle. Any agreement between the two parties would directly affect the starting points of maritime borders, the division of the continental shelf and natural resources, and control over strategic maritime passages in the Red Sea.
The French website Réseau International quoted a source stating that Egypt has worked to safeguard its national interests. A meeting was held between Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and Sudan’s Sovereign Council Chairman Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, during which it was agreed that the Hala’ib Triangle would be considered part of the territory of the Arab Republic of Egypt.
The source revealed that al-Burhan exceeded his authority and bypassed the Sudanese parliament by addressing the National Border Commission through the Sovereign Council on May 11, 2025. He requested the commission to adopt a map that includes the triangle within Egypt’s borders, in the context of discussing the details of maritime border demarcation between Sudan and Saudi Arabia.
The letter indicated that this action was taken based on an agreement between the Chairman of the Sovereign Council and the Egyptian President to resolve the longstanding Egyptian-Sudanese dispute over the area.
The Hala’ib, Shalateen, and Abu Ramad triangle is considered the core of the dispute between Egypt and Sudan due to Egypt’s strategic interests in the region.
The triangle has been under full Egyptian military control since the mid-1990s, following an assassination attempt on former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak—an attempt allegedly supported by Sudan. Egypt has consistently rejected Sudan’s repeated calls to refer the dispute to international arbitration, citing international law, which requires mutual consent from both parties before a case can be brought before an arbitration court.
The Hala’ib, Shalateen, and Abu Ramad triangle has long represented a historic point of tension in Egyptian-Sudanese relations. Although it has been under de facto Egyptian administrative and military control since the mid-1990s—after the 1995 assassination attempt on President Mubarak in Addis Ababa, in which elements linked to Khartoum were accused—Sudan has continued to claim the region and raise the issue in international forums.
Egypt consistently refuses any Sudanese initiatives to refer the dispute to international arbitration, relying on a fundamental principle of international law that arbitration requires the consent of both parties.
Cairo affirms that the triangle lies within its sovereign borders, based on official maps and comprehensive institutional presence, including the provision of state services and civilian and military infrastructure.
The triangle holds increasing strategic importance, not only as an area rich in resources and natural wealth but also because of its key geographic position overseeing vital maritime passages in the Red Sea. This is especially significant amid fast-moving regional developments related to the maritime border demarcation between Sudan and Saudi Arabia. Any change in the starting points of the borders or the distribution of the continental shelf may have direct consequences for Egypt’s maritime security and economic interests, prompting Cairo to intensify its diplomatic and leadership efforts to safeguard what it views as inalienable rights.
Disclaimer: the views and claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the stand of the publisher.
]]>Sources revealed that Ethiopian Intelligence Director Redwan Hussein visited Port Sudan, where he met with the Chairman of the Sovereignty Council and the Director of the General Intelligence Service. The two men conveyed the Ethiopian government’s dissatisfaction with the Sudanese army’s actions regarding its provision of logistical support to Tigray forces in exchange for their deployment in areas of eastern Sudan bordering Ethiopia.
The Ethiopian official expressed Addis Ababa’s anger and resentment over the Sudanese-Eritrean coordination, support for Tigrayan forces, and their involvement in the ongoing conflict in Sudan.
The Ethiopian anger stems from the fact that the areas where the Sudanese army has deployed Tigrayan forces are adjacent to the Ethiopian border, which could result in these armed fighters turning to operating inside Ethiopian territory, especially after they have been armed and regrouped.
Addis Ababa fears the return of Tigrayan fighters and a confrontation with government forces, which had previously defeated them. The meeting also discussed the adoption of a policy of naturalizing Tigrayans in Sudan, and Ethiopia’s rejection of this.
Sudanese journalist Ammar Saeed believes that the recent tension between the Port Sudan government and Addis Ababa is not a spur-of-the-moment development, but rather part of a series of escalating tensions and tensions that reflect the fluid nature of the relationship between the two sides since the outbreak of the Sudanese war in April 2023.
He asserts that the Port Sudan government’s support for the Tigray Front fighters and its provision of logistical support, including training and armament, with the aim of using them as a supporting force in its struggle against the Rapid Support Forces, constituted a qualitative and dangerous shift in the balance of regional alliances.
He added, “This behavior did not go unnoticed by Ethiopia as a direct threat to its national security, especially since the Tigrayans’ relationship with the central government in Addis Ababa remains sensitive and fragile despite the peace agreements.”
However, Ethiopia maintained a measured diplomatic tone, refrained from taking direct action, and refrained from engaging in or supporting any hostile activity against the Port Sudan authority. This demonstrated its commitment to restraint and non-interference in crimes committed by Turkey within its domestic and regional repertoire.
But the most sensitive point in this escalation may be related to Ethiopia’s position within the African Peace and Security Council. Addis Ababa is believed to have played a decisive role in thwarting Sudan’s attempt to lift its suspension from the African Union, based on a view that considers the Port Sudan government an illegitimate coup authority, incapable of building a comprehensive national consensus or ending the war through a political process.
Ammar Saeed says that “Ethiopia’s undeclared veto may have irritated Port Sudan, which viewed it as a threat to its ambitions to gain regional and international legitimacy, prompting it to escalate its political rhetoric toward Addis Ababa.”
He believes what is happening is “a regional power struggle with a local cover, in which the Port Sudan government is operating within forced alliances that are not without risks, while Ethiopia is managing the situation from a more balanced and powerful position, leveraging its weight within the African system and its deep understanding of the complexities of political geography in the Horn of Africa.”
Tensions between the two sides escalated with the outbreak of civil war in Tigray in 2020, when the Sudanese army took advantage of Ethiopia’s preoccupation with the internal conflict to strengthen its military presence in the Al-Fashaga region, a disputed fertile agricultural area.
The Al-Fashaga region, located on the border between Sudan’s Gedaref State and Ethiopia’s Tigray and Amhara regions, is a bone of contention, particularly given Addis Ababa’s repeated accusations that Burhan’s forces support the rebels. Sudan claims the fertile Al-Fashaga border region, a source of ongoing tension for decades, as its own under a 1902 treaty, while Ethiopian farmers inhabit the area with indirect support from Ethiopia.
Previous reports and leaks revealed that the forces of Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, Chairman of Sudan’s Sovereignty Council, support the Tigray People’s Liberation Front in Ethiopia, which is engaged in a conflict with the Ethiopian government.
According to a report published by the Congolese website Beto in June 2025, the Sudanese Sovereignty Council, led by Burhan, adopted a controversial policy granting Sudanese citizenship and permanent residency rights to members of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), to ensure the continued participation of Tigrayan fighters in the Sudanese civil war against the Rapid Support Forces.
Reports also indicate that the Sudanese army has begun deploying Tigrayan fighters to battlefields such as Khartoum, Darfur, and Kordofan, to bolster its armed forces, which have been exhausted by the ongoing conflict.
Disclaimer: the views and claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the stand of the publisher.
]]>U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, is introducing a bill to officially declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
This move is part of a decade-long campaign led by Cruz to designate the group as a terrorist organization. He believes his move is necessary to impose sanctions on the global Islamist network that spawned Hamas and other groups that threaten American interests. Cruz stated that Hamas, which the United States already designates as a terrorist organization, is part of the Muslim Brotherhood, according to its charter.
What’s new in the bill is that it adopts a new “bottom-up” strategy to first identify Muslim Brotherhood branches that explicitly engage in terrorism before designating the entire organization. This approach aims to overcome democratic opposition and avoid potential criticism of prosecuting branches of the group that were not directly involved in violence.
Cruz was joined in sponsoring the Senate bill by several Republican senators, including Tom Cotton, John Boozman, Rick Scott, Ashley Moody, and Dave McCormick. Representatives Mario Diaz-Balart and Jared Moskowitz also introduced a companion bill in the House of Representatives, furthering efforts to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.
Cruz emphasizes that the Muslim Brotherhood remains committed to overthrowing and destroying American and other non-Islamic governments and poses a grave threat to US national security interests. He emphasizes the need to blacklist the Muslim Brotherhood to halt its support for terrorist groups.
The bill states that “Hamas is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, according to its charter, which describes Hamas as one of the wings of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine.” The bill also states, “On October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists committed the worst single-day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, which included the murder, kidnapping, or disappearance of at least 53 American citizens.”
It states that “the Muslim Brotherhood operates as a global organization, providing material support to its branches in countries and regions by providing political support, financial resources, training, services, specialized advice, and communications assistance.” The text of the bill also states that “the Muslim Brotherhood branches have sought to destabilize U.S. allies and partners throughout the Middle East.”
Concurrent with Cruz’s move, Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) introduced a companion bill in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, providing additional momentum to the effort to designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
The new US move against the Brotherhood comes as part of an ongoing Arab and European pressure campaign to besiege the group, drain its resources, and crack down on its tools. Press reports suggest that the Brotherhood’s file will soon reach the European Parliament, in a swift response to last week’s French move.
After chairing an urgent meeting of the National Security Council on July 7, French President Emmanuel Macron directed his government to take new measures aimed at drying up the Muslim Brotherhood’s funding sources and expanding sanctions against it.
Disclaimer: the views and claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the stand of the publisher.
]]>In a development that reflects the depth of the Sudanese crisis, a planned summit between the United States, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, which was set to take place at the end of the month, has been canceled. The summit was intended to discuss ways to end the escalating war in Sudan between the army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
According to informed diplomatic sources, the cancellation of the meeting came as a result of Egypt’s firm rejection of the U.S. efforts, which called for the launch of a political transition phase that would exclude the direct parties to the conflict – the army and the RSF – in an attempt to craft a settlement led by neutral civilian figures under international sponsorship.
However, Egypt, which maintains close ties with the ruling military institution in Sudan, opposed the proposal, considering it an indirect targeting of its military allies in Sudan. According to observers, Egypt’s stance reflects a strategic direction aimed at preserving the current military regime, as it is seen as the sole guarantor of Cairo’s security and economic interests.
This Egyptian rejection, despite Saudi and Emirati approval to discuss and agree on the matter, effectively derailed the efforts of the international quartet and hindered what was seen as an important attempt to build consensus among the four countries regarding a resolution to the conflict.
By sticking to the military option in Sudan, Egypt weakens the chances for international consensus-driven solutions and obstructs efforts to create a comprehensive peaceful transition model. The crisis also highlights the West’s failure to provide a unified vision for post-coup transitions and raises the question of the effectiveness of its contradictory interventions in the continent’s affairs.
Disclaimer: the views and claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the stand of the publisher.
]]>Press reports indicate that the Sudanese army, in coordination with Eritrea, has begun providing logistical support to Tigray forces in Ethiopia, in exchange for their deployment in areas of eastern Sudan bordering Ethiopia.
Reliable reports indicate that the Sudan Shield Forces, led by Abu Aqla Kikil, have directed a number of their units towards the Ethiopian border to support the Tigray forces.
The Sudanese army recruited fighters from the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, with whom it strongly sympathized, against Ethiopian government forces between 2020 and 2022, resulting in numerous casualties before peace was reached in South Africa in November 2022. The involvement of Tigrayan forces in the Sudanese conflict is a source of concern for Addis Ababa, which has found itself forced to reconsider its position on both sides of the conflict in Sudan.
The Ethiopian government previously announced in November 2024 that it had obtained several useful pieces of information thanks to the fighting against the Tigray rebel group, which had previously fought alongside Sudanese forces. They continue to argue that the behavior of the Sudanese government could expand the civil conflict and open the door to a variety of scenarios.
Tigray forces are known for serious abuses and violations, both in Sudan and Ethiopia, and Human Rights Watch has previously accused them of numerous serious human rights violations.
The forces launched attacks on civilians in multiple areas, resulting in innocent casualties and significant loss of life and property, particularly in Al-Jazirah State in western Sudan. They also exacerbated the humanitarian situation in the Tigray region, where residents suffered from shortages of food, healthcare, and clean water.
Tigray forces launched missile strikes on the Eritrean capital, Asmara, and the Amhara region, raising international concern and some countries considering it a violation of international law. They also sought to seize control of important strategic areas, including the Ethiopian Hamra region, and control the land crossing between Ethiopia and Sudan, impacting trade and humanitarian aid flows.
Alliance of Interests
During the civil conflict in Sudan, a military and political alliance emerged between the Sudanese army, led by Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, and the Tigrayan forces.
According to press reports, the Sudanese army has been using mercenaries from Tigray forces to bolster its position against the Rapid Support Forces, as part of its well-known and long-standing strategy of using militias in its internal and regional wars.
The alliance between the Sudanese army and Tigrayan forces was not surprising, as it was more of a mutual benefit, especially since General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan’s forces had previously supported these rebels against the Ethiopian government.
Some Tigrayan elements who refused to sign the Ethiopian government’s agreement also found refuge in Sudan, where Colonel Abad Al-Tahiri Al-Zein, of the 46th Defense Battalion, oversaw their assembly, training, and engagement in battle.
The Sudanese army includes more than 20 mercenary groups, including leaders from ISIS and al-Qaeda, who are active in Port Sudan, Atbara, and Karari, according to the confessions of one of the prisoners, Muhammad Ali al-Jazouli, who confirmed his affiliation with al-Qaeda.
Disclaimer: the views and claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the stand of the publisher.
]]>

The event proceeded with a detailed presentation by renowned technology expert Mr. Solomon Kassa, who elaborated on the new Phantom V2 Flip smartphones and their integration with Tecno AI. His visual presentation provided attendees with a comprehensive understanding of Tecno’s advancements and how these innovations align with the growing capabilities of AI technology.

The new Tecno AI Assistant application is designed to greatly enhance daily life, offering features such as advanced language translation, automated photo editing, voice-to-text conversion, and various other tasks that simplify and expedite user interactions.

Guests at the event had the opportunity to closely explore the Phantom V2 Flip smartphones and other new Tecno products at designated display booths. These showcases included demonstrations of AI technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and interactive AI-powered games. Attendees were also treated to a photo exhibition highlighting the impressive camera capabilities of Tecno devices.

By incorporating AI technology, Tecno continues its tradition of delivering high-quality, user-friendly products. The brand remains a strong competitor in the global technology market, striving to provide cutting-edge solutions and modern innovations to its customers. This dedication underscores Tecno’s commitment to improving user experience and contributing to the digital transformation of its communities.


Since introducing the first center pivot design over 50 years ago, Lindsay through its Zimmatic brand has continuously led the way in innovation. Today, Lindsay offers the most durable and technologically advanced irrigation solutions to help Ethiopian farmers achieve their best growing seasons yet.
Dantimo Trading plc is leading the charge. Dantimo Group Chairman Mohammed Magid stated, “We are delighted and privileged to be able to serve our nation by advancing the future of agricultural equipment. We invite all consumers, distributors, and partners to work together to advance the nation’s agriculture industry
Why Choose a Zimmatic Pivot?
Investing in a Zimmatic pivot means choosing an irrigation system renowned for its unmatched precision, quality, and durability. Lindsay’s advanced technology ensures that water is delivered exactly where it’s needed, minimizing waste, and optimizing crop yield. From rotators and sprays to LEPA and wobblers, Lindsay provides custom-tailored solutions designed to maximize water efficiency.

Built to Conquer Any Challenge
Zimmatic pivot systems are designed to handle any terrain, topography, climate, cropping condition, or layout. Key features include:
Built to Last
Zimmatic’s commitment to durability is evident in every component:
features a shorter output shaft, reducing overhang load and extending bearing life. The industry’s largest expansion chamber helps reduce pressure and temperature fluctuations, contributing to a longer lifespan.
Tailored for Every Ethiopian Field
Understanding that every field presents unique challenges, Lindsay through its brand Zimmatic offers a range of systems to meet various needs:
Advanced Technology for Maximum Control
Modern farming in Ethiopia requires advanced tools for efficient management. Lindsay’s range of controllers, all FieldNet-ready, offer sophisticated, user-friendly interfaces for complete command over pivot operations. From the 500C, 700C, and 712C panels, each equipped with remote monitoring and control compatibility, to the VISION for laterals that provide intelligent system control, Lindsay ensures you have the best technology at your fingertips.
A Smart Investment for the Future
Lindsay’s irrigation solutions are more than just a purchase; they are an investment in the future of Ethiopian agriculture. With superior technology, customizable solutions, and unparalleled durability, Zimmatic brand stands out as a leader in precision irrigation. Ethiopian farmers can rely on Lindsay to provide efficient, reliable, and innovative irrigation solutions that enhance productivity and sustainability.
Global Impact, Local Benefits
With a presence in over 90 countries, Lindsay has a global impact on farming communities. From large-scale commercial operations to small family farms, Lindsay’s irrigation systems are helping to transform agriculture, improve food security, and support economic development around the world.
Embrace the Future with Zimmatic
For Ethiopian farmers and investors, Lindsay offers the future of farming today. Experience the benefits of precision irrigation, robust reliability, smart technology, and sustainable practices. Join the thousands of farmers worldwide who trust Lindsay to enhance their productivity and ensure a prosperous future for agriculture.

Together we can fight food scarcity by leveraging on mechanized irrigation and advancing large scale food production in Ethiopia.
The chairman expresses gratitude to Mr. Nambwale Kalunga, Zimmatic Territory Manager, Sub-Saharan Africa, for his efforts to make this travel with the team as efficient and successful as possible
]]>
Every St. Patrick’s Day, Irish Embassies around the world take the occasion to mark our national day with pride and to reflect on the strong relationships which bind Ireland to the rest of the world. In Ethiopia, the Embassy of Ireland in Addis Ababa is no different. Every year on March 17th, we reflect on the strong and historical relationship which links Ireland and Ethiopia. It goes back at least as far as 1936, when the then Irish Prime Minister Éamon de Valera supported Emperor Haile Selassie’s call for support at the League of Nations against the invasion of Mussolini’s Italy. We remember the efforts of Irish priests, sisters and missionaries to improve the lives of Ethiopians throughout the 20th century and the work of Bob Geldof and others to address the extraordinary famine which afflicted Ethiopia in the 1980s. This year is especially memorable for us at the Embassy as we mark 30 years of Ireland–Ethiopia diplomatic relations, since the opening of the Irish Embassy in Addis Ababa in 1994.
We realise that, in Ireland, we are fortunate to have a National Day that is known in many corners of the world. St. Patrick’s Day is an opportunity to celebrate Ireland with the more than 70 million people globally who claim Irish ancestry and the many more who show their fondness for Ireland in a great variety of ways.
Ireland’s own history includes experiences of famine, poverty and forced migration. Even the relative growth and prosperity we have enjoyed since joining the European Union in 1973 co-existed, at least until the 1990s, with conflict in Northern Ireland. These experiences have, to an obvious degree, shaped how we view the world around us today. It is because of this history, because of these challenges which Ireland has faced, that we view the celebrations of St. Patrick’s Day around the world with great pride.
The notion of “celebrating” something like a national day in our world today might provoke hesitation for some people. We are seeing challenges around the world today, in Ukraine, in Gaza, in the Horn of Africa. People across the world are suffering from extreme hardship. But for many in Ireland, St. Patrick’s Day is not just a celebration, it is a day on which we mark the strong principles and values which Irish people hold dear. It is a day on which we mark the contributions which Ireland and Irish people have dedicated their lives to improving the lot of their fellow people and to confronting the challenges which the world faces.
And so it should be no surprise that we look to young people as we seek to tackle such grand challenges. Young people have been to the fore in opening our eyes to the climate emergency and to the innovative solutions that can reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and deliver a clean energy future. Young people globally have demanded respect for international law and for multilateral institutions, and for key actors like the UN Security Council to speak and act coherently in support of a rules-based order, sustainable development and human rights. There key priorities are central to Ireland’s approach to the world.
Young Irish people in Ethiopia have and are working to educate young Ethiopians. They are working on humanitarian action and to improve the lives of the furthest behind first – all of these efforts combining and aligning to contribute to fulfilling Ireland’s vision of a better world for all.
Young people are at the heart of what makes Ireland a great place to invest, trade, visit and study too. Companies have put down roots in Ireland because of our economic track record, stability, ease of doing business and access to a European Union market of 450 million people. But they are also in Ireland because of our talent pool, with brilliant globally-connected young people from across the European Union a key part of our dynamic workforce.
Ireland is a country where enterprise is valued and young entrepreneurs are supported to bring their products and ideas to international markets. And many of those ideas have blossomed in a world-class Irish university system that attracts thousands of students from around the world because of the safe, welcoming and culturally rich environment on offer in Ireland for young people.
Every year, the Irish Embassy in Addis Ababa is proud to send young Ethiopians to Ireland for masters’ programme studies to benefit from the richness of this education system. In 2024, an additional 12 Ethiopian students will be funded by the Government of Ireland to pursue a master’s degree in Ireland, the highest number ever in one year. They are following in the footsteps of over 200 Ethiopian young people who have studied in Ireland and who return to contribute to Ethiopia’s development and to stronger people-to-people links between our two countries.
And so, Ireland, the Irish people, and the Embassy of Ireland in Addis Ababa would like to take the opportunity this March 17thto wish the people of Ethiopia a very happy St. Patrick’s Day. As we proceed together into the future, hand in hand with the Ethiopian people, we look forward to a deepening partnership which will benefit all of us, Ireland and Ethiopia alike. Together, we can all be a voice for progress, for peace, for human dignity and for equality for all.
There is an old Irish saying: “Arscáth a chéile a mhaireannnnaDaoine” – “We live in each other’s shadow”. This will remain true for our young people in the world in the years to come. Protecting and supporting each other, and building enduring partnerships, has never been more vital. It is our focus too this St. Patrick’s Day.
]]>የኦቪድ ቤቶች ባንክ አ.ማ (በምስረታ ላይ) አደራጆች የባንኩ መስራች ባለአክስዮን መሆን ለሚፈልጉ አክሲዮን ገዥዎች በኢትዮጵያ ንግድ ህግ አንቀጽ 259 መሰረት በምስረታ ላይ የሚገኝ መሆኑን እየገለጽን የአክሲዮን ሽያጩን ለመፈጸም ያስቸል ዘንድ ከኢትዮጵያ ብሔራዊ ባንክ በተፈቀደልን መሰረት በተለያዩ የንግድ ባንኮች ዝግ ሂሳብ (ለዋና አክሲዮን ግዥ ) እና ተንቀሳቃሽ ሂሳብ (ለኣገልግሎት ክፍያ ) ተከፍቶ ሽያጩን በማከናወን ላይ ይገኛል።
ስለሆነም አደራጆች ባንኩን የፋይናንስ አግልግሎቶችን አካታች እና ተደራሽ በማድረግ እንዲሁም ሀብት ከማህበረሰቡ በማሰባሰብ በዋናነት ለቤቶች ግዥ፣ ግንባታ፣ እድሳት እና ማሻሻያ ብድር በማቅረብ የዜጎችን የመኖሪያ ቤት እጥረት በመቅረፍ ረገድ የበኩሉን አሰተዋጽኦ በማድረግ ለባለአክሲዮኖችም ጠቀም ያለና አስተማማኝ የሆነ ትርፍ ተካፋይ እንዲሆኑ ለማድረግ አስቦ እየስራ መሆኑን እየገለጥን ማህበረሰባችን አክስዮኖችን እንዲገዛ በታላቅ ትህትና እና አክብሮት እንጋብዛለን።
የሚሸጠዉ አክስዮን አይነት፣ ብዛት፣ ዋጋ እና ሽያጭ
ማሳሰቢያ፡፟የአክስዮን ሽያጩ የሚከናወነው ለኢትዮጵያዊያን ዜጎች በብር ሲሆን ትውልደ ኢትዮጵያዊያን ለሆኑ የውጭ አገር ዜግነት ላላቸው አክሲዮን ገዥዎች ግዥውን መፈፀም የሚችሉት በብሔራዊ ባንክ መመሪያ ቁጥር SBB/73/2020 መሰረት ተቀባይነት ባላቸው የውጭ ሀገራት ገንዘቦች ብቻ ይሆናል።
አደራጅ አባላት
የአክሲዮን ሽያጭ የሚከናወንባቸው ባንኮች ዝርዝር
ለበለጠ መረጃ አትላስ አካባቢ ፕላቲኒየም ፕላዛ 4ኛ ፎቅ የሚገኘዉን የባንኩን የፕሮጀክት ጽ/ቤት በአካል በመቅረብ ወይም በስልክ ቁጥር 0904151411 በመደወል ማናገር የምትችሉ መሆኑን በትህትና እንገልጻለን፡፡
]]>