I recall a particularly frustrating experience from a couple of years back, one I suspect resonates with most of us. I had gone to a local retailer to pick up some essential items – cooking oil and rice. The price quoted was, to put it mildly, shocking; it was vastly higher than what had been the standard rate just a week earlier. When I cautiously asked the shop owner about the increase, he met my question with a dismissive shrug. “That is the price now,” he said. “Everyone is selling at this rate. You can take it or leave it.” His tone carried an air of indifference that felt like a slap in the face – a moment that has become all too familiar to so many.
In that moment, I wasn’t just a customer; I was a captive. My choices were to pay his inflated price or go home without dinner ingredients for my family. This isn’t just about one rude shopkeeper; it is a symptom of a much larger economic disease. And it is precisely why the government’s recent move to open the wholesale and retail sector to foreign competition isn’t just a policy shift – it is a potential lifeline for every Ethiopian struggling with the cost of living.
For decades, Ethiopia’s wholesale and retail sectors have been reserved for local businesses. The intention to nurture domestic enterprise was noble. However, in the absence of real competition, this protection has fostered a culture of complacency and deeply unethical practices. We have all seen the symptoms: sudden, unexplained price hikes on essentials, the mysterious disappearance of items only to reappear at a premium, and a general attitude of exploitation because consumers have no alternative. These are not anecdotes; they are a consistent pattern of market failure.
These practices are a primary driver of the cost-of-living crisis. When a limited number of players can control supply and price without fear of a competitor offering a better deal, the outcome is inevitably inflationary. Monopolies and protected oligopolies serve the interests of the sellers, not the consumers. While local businesses rightly cite challenges like access to finance, these difficulties cannot justify practices that harm the public and distort the entire economy. Decades of protection have done little to spur these businesses toward the efficiency and innovation that define mature economies. A short-term mindset has backfired, limiting their own potential and damaging their reputation.
The government’s decision to open these sectors is not an ideological move but a pragmatic intervention. Introducing foreign competition is the only proven antidote to the disease of market abuse. Imagine if I could have left that indifferent shopkeeper and taken my business to a competitor known for consistent, transparent pricing. That simple act of choice is revolutionary. It forces every player in the market to raise their game, to compete on price, quality, and service. The consumer is no longer a hostage; they become a king whose patronage must be earned.
Critically, this move does far more than just fix our retail sector. It also sends a powerful, unequivocal signal to the entire global investment community. Opening a long-protected sector is a tangible demonstration that Ethiopia is truly committed to economic modernization and market-led principles. For foreign investors, actions speak louder than words. This policy shift is a decisive action that builds immense confidence, proving the government is willing to make difficult, structural reforms to create a more open and predictable business environment. This confidence is the bedrock upon which large-scale, long-term investment is built. When investors see a nation willingly transition from a protected, opaque market to a competitive, transparent one, they perceive lower risk and a greater commitment to the rules of global commerce. This first wave of investment in retail will serve as a proof of concept, encouraging investors in manufacturing, logistics, and technology to follow, creating a virtuous cycle of capital inflow that benefits the entire economy.
The benefits extend far beyond price tags and investor sentiment. Foreign entrants bring sophisticated, technology-driven supply chains that drastically reduce waste, spoilage, and cost. This efficiency breaks the bottlenecks often used to justify hoarding and gouging. They also bring a culture of long-term investment, creating new jobs and providing valuable training that builds human capital within the country. Their presence forces a raising of standards across the entire sector.
However, a potent counterargument persists: that this move equals selling our economic sovereignty, trading local exploitation for foreign domination. This fear, rooted in a post-colonial suspicion, is powerful but, in this context, a misconception. I would argue that the true betrayal of sovereignty is allowing the current, broken system to continue.
Economic sovereignty is not merely about ownership; it is about control and who benefits. Who truly benefits from the status quo? A narrow segment of local business owners. And who bears the cost? The overwhelming majority of the Ethiopian public. By introducing competition, the government is reasserting its sovereignty on behalf of its people, structuring the market to serve the public good, which is the highest expression of national interest.
Furthermore, the idea of foreign “domination” misunderstands modern retail investment. These companies are not colonial enterprises. To succeed, they must embed themselves in the Ethiopian economy. They will source products locally, employ thousands of Ethiopians, pay taxes, and invest in physical infrastructure. This is a partnership governed by Ethiopian laws, not domination.
The goal is not to replace local businesses but to force their evolution. The future should be a blended, dynamic ecosystem. The presence of efficient foreign players creates a high ceiling of standards, showing local entrepreneurs what is possible. Ambitious Ethiopian businesses will learn, adapt, and innovate. This is how local businesses transition from protected infants into robust, competitive adults.
The opening of the sector is an act of confidence. It is a bet on the Ethiopian consumer and on the potential of our entrepreneurship to rise to a challenge. This decision is a reclamation of economic sovereignty for the benefit of the many. It will be disruptive, but the right response is not to retreat behind walls of fear. It is to adapt and to improve. Securing the public’s livelihood and attracting global capital to build our future is the highest form of sovereignty there is.
Befikadu Eba is Founder and Managing Director of Erudite Africa Investments, a former Banker with strong interests in Economics, private sector development and financial inclusion. He is reachable at [email protected].
Contributed by Befikadu Eba
